07 Jan 13, 11:02 am
what if they leave the lots out that are plotted over the originally marked trail?
I do not believe that all the trails are represented on the borough's plot. most of the existing trails are in place of the borough's plans as they run through the existing trails that are not marked on the map. If the borough does not recognize the current trails that are existing but not on the plot it may be difficult to argue that the area should not completely be built on. I believe they should find elswhere to build.
If we must compromise on the area, I would say that everything on the map looks good except for lots:
5 - 1.6 AC
4 - 1.4 AC
3 - 1.3 AC
14 -2.2 AC
13 - 1.6 AC
11 - 1.3 AC
10 - 1.6 AC
7 - 1.8 AC
6 - 1.6 AC
3 - 1.8 AC
as those plots run over the current and existent recognized trail.
I do not believe that all the trails are represented on the borough's plot. most of the existing trails are in place of the borough's plans as they run through the existing trails that are not marked on the map. If the borough does not recognize the current trails that are existing but not on the plot it may be difficult to argue that the area should not completely be built on. I believe they should find elswhere to build.
If we must compromise on the area, I would say that everything on the map looks good except for lots:
5 - 1.6 AC
4 - 1.4 AC
3 - 1.3 AC
14 -2.2 AC
13 - 1.6 AC
11 - 1.3 AC
10 - 1.6 AC
7 - 1.8 AC
6 - 1.6 AC
3 - 1.8 AC
as those plots run over the current and existent recognized trail.