Advent Wrote:The worst part is that I'm actually arguing on jeep's behalf.
How in the heck did that happen?!
Finally he realizes his logic flaw! :tease:
My point - to restate the stated - Solid frames are stronger than unibody "frames".
Yes the solid frames can wear out - but will do so much less, and last longer before they do, if abused in similar ways.
Unibody's offer little positive to a serious 4x4 - and ground clearance is minimal.
So why would JEEP - a company known for off-road vehciles build a vehicle with a unibody?
Ah - back to the less truck more car - which makes my point.
Again I ask - what actual benefit besides minimal ground clearance does a unibody offer?
![[-]](http://www.arcticoffroad.com/images/collapse.png)