Posts: 111
Threads: 311
Thanks Received: 3 in 3 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
7
We talked about this some more at my TAC meeting tonight.
Each of us should browse the listings as this is the listing of AVAILABLE borough land. If we find a big area that we can propose be set aside for recreation....Mat-Su trails foundation taught us the phrase "OHV playground"...we can suggest that. Our suggestions could happen, especially if such an area would have low cost to the FNSB and would not have to be a one acre park...
•
Posts: 111
Threads: 311
Thanks Received: 3 in 3 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
7
Just in case you want to enter a recommendation:
the 8/9 deadline is nenearing impact areas for us:
1) ester
2) Peede road extension
3) Banner Creek
4) Gilmore Trail
I think nominations for at least 2, 3 &4 should be "hold for recreation.
•
Posts: 111
Threads: 311
Thanks Received: 3 in 3 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
7
Got my comments in.
Hope others did too!
•
Posts: 82
Threads: 670
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
mine were submitted today as well.
•